![]() ![]() They further agreed that Richard’s future child support obligations would be reduced to $10,500 monthly.įinally, the parties agreed a trial would be held before Commissioner Richard G. The parties agreed Richard would pay Lauralin $524,400 to satisfy all arrearages. In November 2018, the parties entered into a stipulation to resolve certain spousal and child support issues, including Richard being in arrears on his support obligations. ![]() In 2014, Richard filed a request for order (RFO) seeking, among other things, a reduction in his child support obligations and termination of spousal support. In 2011, they entered into a stipulated judgment of dissolution of marriage, which provided that Richard would pay $15,000 monthly in spousal support and $13,200 in child support. They have four children, all of whom suffer from significant disabilities. Richard and Lauralin were married in 1990 and separated in 2006. Accordingly, we affirm in part, and reverse in part. As discussed below, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in granting Lauralin’s motion to dismiss, but erred in conditioning the filing of future modification requests on Richard being current on his support obligations. The trial court granted Lauralin’s motion and on its own, conditioned the filing of any future modification requests on Richard being current on his support obligations. In re Marriage of LAURALIN ANDERSON COHEN and RICHARD COHEN.Īppeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior CourtĪfter Richard Cohen (Richard) filed a request to modify his child support and spousal support obligations, Lauralin Anderson Cohen (Lauralin) moved to dismiss Richard’s motion under the disentitlement doctrine as Richard was delinquent on his support obligations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |